With a mom and pop establishment just around the corner from
my childhood home, I was often tasked with purchasing a half gallon of milk or
a loaf of bread. When I stood at the counter to pay, I handed over $.31 for the
bread, a quarter for the milk. If I wanted a treat and had a cent or two to
spare, I paid specifically for the strawberry laces, or for the piece of adding
machine tape with rows of candy dots or a wax bottle filled with an ounce of
flavored water. In those days, I got what I paid for, and I paid for what I got.
I grew up thinking that’s how the world worked.
But perhaps not. I recently discovered that if I wanted a
junior bacon cheeseburger, fries, and a Coke at a certain fast food
establishment, I could pay for them separately, or else order a four for four
“deal,” with my three items plus chicken nuggets, available for less money than
my three preferred selections. I didn’t want the nuggets, as I don’t eat
chicken nuggets, but it cost me less money to get them and throw them away. Go
figure.
The practice is a marketing ploy called bundling. Growing up
in Buffalo winters, I was used to bundling up, hat, scarf, mittens, and even
the Wonder Bread bags in my snow boots. But that’s not what bundling means in
marketing. Instead, a product bundling strategy is a marketing approach where
multiple products or components are packaged together into one bundled
purchase.
I encountered this with a cell phone, as a package deal
provided a “free” tablet and some kind of contraption for my car that I had no
desire to use. It popped up again with Spectrum, the new name for Time-Warner,
the cable provider in Stark County. Larry made the arrangements for our cable
and internet service, and when I received our first bill, I was surprised to
find we were paying $29.99 (plus taxes and fees) for a home phone line. Now we
haven’t had a home phone for years, and have no need of one now. We don’t even
have a phone to plug into the service. So why a home phone on our bill? Well,
chalk it up to product bundling.
I tried to cancel the service on line, but there was no way
to delete service, only to add more channels to our package. When I called, I
spent time on hold, and finally the customer service rep explained that the
product was bundled, and that we would get the best price if we took all three
services. “But I don’t want a home phone!” Yes, but we give you a discount on
your other products when you sign up, and when you have our home phone, you can
call Puerto Rico for free (that’s what the small print said, so I could check
on our friends who’ve been without electricity for months without paying extra
on my cable bill – if I bought a phone). In frustration, I finally terminated
the call. I’ll try again when I’m at a better place mentally (smiley face).
Bundling is not limited to sales and service. It’s even how
our federal government works (or doesn’t, given our history with government
shutdowns). Want a spending package? Let’s see if we can convince the American
people that bundling in CHIP funding, DACA, and money for “the wall” is the
best deal. Why don’t they just pass a separate bill on CHIP funding, a bill on
immigration, a bill on border security, and a budget? Why bundle them together?
Bargaining power, leverage, manipulation? Whatever happened to congressional
hearings, floor debate, and voting on individual issues?
In the 2016 election, the term “draining the swamp”
resonated with many people. But like the fast food server or the cable company
representative, the problem doesn’t lie as much in the swamp-dwellers (people)
as in the swamp itself (process). What if we allowed the governing process to
concentrate on what the people of our country need, one issue at a time,
instead of loading up the swamp with unwanted chicken nuggets? Seems to me it’s
worth a try.
No comments:
Post a Comment